Essay On Muckraker

1042 Words5 Pages
Muckraker "[Is] it a compliment to be called a muckraker?" (Miraldi 8). The answer to this question differs from person to person. In the early 1900s, a "muckraker" was considered to be a journalist who went too far in order to get a story, as popularized by Theodore Roosevelt's 1906 speech ("People & Events: Ida Tarbell, 1857-1944" 1). However, today "muckraker" takes on a more positive connotation, referring to a journalist "who inquires into and publishes scandal and allegations of corruption among political and business leaders" ("Muckraker" 2). The more recent definition of a "muckraker" is the more accurate of the two, since it depicts investigative journalists in a positive light. These journalists should be able to go to whatever length necessary to reveal any harmful acts being committed toward American society, even…show more content…
Ida exposed a powerful businessman's " corruption in business and political lawlessness", making her a "muckraker" as well ("People & Events: Ida Tarbell, 1857-1944" 1). This investigative journalist revealed the truth without pushing the limit, but still had a major impact by informing the public of this dishonesty in business. The positive influence Ida Tarbell had on American society shows how "muckraker" is a complimentary statement. In conclusion, "muckraker" is a positive term used to describe a devoted investigative journalist who exposes injustices committed by the leaders of the political and business worlds. They reveal the truth of an injustice in society, helping to better improve society. They acquire the information for these stories through acceptable means. Therefore, "[is] it a compliment to be called a muckraker?" (Miraldi 8). Yes, because of the vital contributions "muckrakers" have made to society, they should be proud to be part of this exclusive club. #244348
Open Document