morality in Aquinas

Morality is universally understood as a class of rules held by society to govern the right conduct of its members. Holding strong to this notion St. Thomas Aquinas, brings to light this understanding as personal inclination (or will) to achieve an ultimate end (God); in which those actions become the mean to understandings the human purpose. In his book, A Summary of Philosophy, Aquinas claims that the existence of God allows us to reason with the things around and wills us to act. In a different approach, Friedrich Nietzsche claims that morality is relative to time and power; our actions whether moral or immoral depend on the power they bestow to the perspectives that we hold. He doesn’t believe in a moral definition of what is good and bad; because historically it is contradicted by the men of power. Within these two different approaches I believe that Aquinas’ God and Nietzsche’s will of power in human affairs essentially becomes the morality by which we come to understand morality. Aquinas first claims that God’s existence is not itself, self-evident because we do not know the essence of God (Aquinas 3). Instead, he states we can prove Gods’ existence through the things that are in themselves already self-evident to us. Aquinas provides five predicates for God as the Immovable motor of all movement, the uncaused Cause of all causes and effects, the necessary and supremely perfect being from which all beings relate, and supreme Intelligence which governs the actions of all beings (Aquinas 4-6). Through rationalization of everything that we believe God not to be Aquinas brings to light the nature of all that he actually is.
The first is about motion, which means every kind of change, not just local motion or change of place, but also ripening, heating (Aquinas 47). For there to occur any motion like these, it must be caused by some other kind of moving cause;