The Giver Society vs. Modern Urban Society

1376 Words6 Pages
Gianna Katz Mr. Fornataro Honors English I 20 April 2015 The Giver Society v. Modern Urban Society Many people would argue that a crime-free, war-free, hunger-free, and pain-free society would be far superior to the current way of life in most modern urban areas. In The Giver by Lois Lowry, this society exists. In The Giver, children are assigned their job, and place in society by the time they are 12 years old, their spouses, children, meals, houses and medications are pre-selected for them. Some of the jobs are similar to what we have in our society, such as doctors, teachers, and factory workers. Among those jobs is one that is not found in modern society. This is the job of being the Reciever, or one who holds all the memories of the world before the current dystopian society. That being said, I strongly believe that living in a modern urban city is better than living in the community from The Giver. I believe so because all citizens do not know the concept of color, and have never seen color in their life; the aspect of personal choice is eliminated, as all of their futures are hand-picked for them; and no one in the community knows true pain, and therefore cannot fathom true happiness. None of the citizens in The Giver's community have ever experienced color, which surpresses their creativity at the root. Without something as simple as color affecting people's decisions, diversity, and creativity, life is dull before it even has the chance to become exciting. With Jonas and The Giver being the exceptions in the colorblind community, they are the only ones who realize what the entire society is missing. Jonas expresses his grief on the topic in the following quote: "Well ... "Jonas had to stop and think it through. "If everything's the same, then there aren't any choices! I want to wake up in the morning and decide things! A blue tunic, or a red
Open Document