A Critique Of Martin Gansberg’s “Thirty-Eight Who

458 Words2 Pages
A Critique of Martin Gansberg’s “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police” In Martin Gansberg’s essay “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call The Police,” he tell us the story of a young New York City woman named Miss Genovese who is murdered by Winston Mosley while thirty-eight of her neighbor see this happen and yet do not call the police. Gansberg takes us step by step through how the murder took place that fateful night, and also shows us how the neighbors reacted as it was happening. Later in the article, Gansberg gives us interviews with the neighbors on why they didn’t call the police. Gansberg argues what could have happened if the neighbors had called the police as soon as the attack took place. One of the reasons Gansberg argues what could have happened if the police had been called as soon as the attack happened is that Miss Genovese could have been saved. Assistant Chief Inspector Frederick M. Lussen claims “If we had been called when he [Winston Mosley] first attacked, the woman might not be dead now” (601). In other words, the phone call being made late is what cost Miss Genovese her life. Gansberg tells us at 3:30 A.M is around the time the attack started, however it was 3:50 by the time the police received their first call (602).Gansberg’s is saying that in that 20 minutes, the police should have been called, maybe even saving Miss Genovese’s life. Gansberg also criticizes why the neighbors either never called or took so long to call. Gansberg tell us in his article “asked why they hadn’t called the police, she (housewife) shrugged and replied: “I don’t know.”” (Gansberg 602). That’s not ever the worst of it. Another man claims in Gansberg’s article that he was “… tired” and “… went back to bed” (Gansberg 603). But not all neighbors knew it was an attack, some “thought it was a lover’s quarrel.”(Gansberg 602). The point that

More about A Critique Of Martin Gansberg’s “Thirty-Eight Who

Open Document