Analysis of a Dolls House

554 Words3 Pages
Analysis of A Doll’s House “Tragedy with a Hopeful Ending” A Dolls house written by Henrick Ibsen is a play about a husband and wife and their dysfunctional marriage. The two main characters Nora and Torvald’s relationship revolves a lot around money, which causes lots of problems. During the play Nora makes a couple realizations. First being that she is nothing but a trophy wife and second being that she has no idea what is like to live her own life. These realizations make her pack her things up and leave her family to start her new life. The out come of this play has been considered a tragedy but I think differently. A Doll’s House is not a traditional tragedy because it does not fit the conventional definition. According to Webster’s Dictionary, a tragedy is: medieval poem describing the fall of a great and royal man and serious drama with a conflict between a protagonist and a superior force ending in sorrow or disaster that brings forth pity or terror. A Doll’s House does not fit this definition. The characters are not royalty; Nora does not have a true downfall, and this in not written in a poem format. When relating A Doll’s House to the above tradition definition Ibsen’s story does not fit the first part where it mentions royalty. All of the characters in this play are commoners. Although the main characters Nora and Torvald Helmer may be financially well off and have prestigious jobs, they are still apart of common society. Another reason why this play would not be consider a traditional tragedy is because the it is written in prose instead of the classical poem format. This maybe be because it was written later than traditional tragedies. When thinking of traditional tragedy that first thing that comes to my mind is Romeo and Juliet. In this particular play and other tragedies during this time period the majority of them end dramatically with
Open Document