Analysis Of All Quiet On The Western Front

1076 Words5 Pages
There are two accounts of every war; one for each side. No story is completely told without telling both accounts. All Quiet on the Western Front is the German account of World War I. The author, Erich Maria Remarque, tells the German account from the first-person viewpoint of a German soldier named Paul. Paul tells the horrors of the front-line in battle as well as about life in camp. The struggles and hardships Paul identifies show the reader in many ways the destructiveness of war and its lasting effects. The destruction of war is a theme that is identified in many ways throughout the novel. For one, the war takes away everything the soldiers have; there is no past or future. In the present, there is nothing but war. “The war has ruined…show more content…
The soldiers are forced to live in horrible conditions, given barely enough food to keep from starvation, and subjected to battle which could take their lives at any moment. “The front is a cage in which we must await fearfully whatever may happen. (Remarque 101)” These entire conditions combine together to leave a deep psychological impact on the soldiers. This psychological impact changes the soldier’s entire lives. For example, when Paul returns home on leave he cannot talk to his mother because he does not know life outside of the war. He also can’t imagine life after the war. The war takes over their entire lives and becomes the only thing they…show more content…
Nationalism can cause a person to commit extreme acts for one’s country that they normally would not do. However, the strongest sense of nationalism is usually instilled in the children of a country from the moment they are born. They grow up hearing that it is their duty to join the army and that their first duty is to their county. The young men of Germany are not forced to join, but they are alienated if they do not. Because of all this, the young men of Germany enlist in the army the moment they turn eighteen. They do not stop and consider whether they agree with the reasons for the war being fought but enter blindly into the war with glorified ideas of bravery and patriotism. “But what I would like to know…is whether there would have been a war if the Kaiser had said No…well, if not him alone, then perhaps if twenty or thirty people in the world had said No. (Remarque 203)” Nothing could prepare them for the horrors of the war. Once they enter the war, the soldiers stop and consider the reasons for it being fought and whether it could have been prevented. Once they get to the front-lines of battle they do not fight to kill their enemies; they fight to save their own lives. The soldier’s take on life changes completely once they get to the front lines. Their ideas of their enemy are no longer the same. “It’s queer, when one thinks about it,” goes on Kropp, “we are here to protect our fatherland. And the French
Open Document