Archibald Prize Controversy Analysis

928 Words4 Pages
While recording the changing face of Australian society, The Archibald Prize has indeed triggered controversy. Various artists from around Australasia instantly became motivated to undertake this competition after the first Archibald Prize being awarded in 1921. The money the prize offered wasn’t the only motive that made the artists eager, but the publicity involved giving them an opportunity to have their work shown in a major gallery. However, the major matter really deserves to be considered controversial is the quality of the painting. The conceptual framework of artist, artwork, audience and world is definitely evident in the process of creating a portrait legible to submit to the competition. Several controversies and debates have occurred…show more content…
Portraits submitted to the Archibald Prize must adhere to specific guidelines in order to be approved and accepted for the competition. Craig Ruddy’s portrait contested the traditions of the art making process as he remarked, “I work fairly high and quickly. So I knew it was possible, but yeah, it was a challenge, especially with the size of it”, which also demonstrates the technical resolution of Ruddy’s ideas and approach to his portrait. He challenged the rules of the competition to express his portrait of David Gulpilil proficiently, leading up to majority of the portraiture piece produced in charcoal to emphasise Gulpilil’s features. Controversy over the argument of Tony Johansen brought about challenging that the portrait was an illustration rather than a…show more content…
The world is what demands technical advances, which influences materials used in the portraits for the Archibald. As the world often sets guidelines to what is acceptable and not, back in 1943 an artist named William Dobell with a portrait of artist Joshua Smith won the Archibald Prize, but was explicitly battled in court as the portrait was viewed as distorted and caricatured formed. In spite of Dobell’s response to the challenge generating debate he declares “a sincere artist is not one who makes a faithful attempt to put on to canvas what is in front of him, but one who tries to create something which is... a living thing”. This influenced him to create a work in the sculptural setting – and so built it up as a sculptor builds up any form. This culminated in the few aspects of how argument towards the contest is evident. Thus, in summary all of these events and controversies have driven the Archibald Prize to maintain its importance to artists all around Australasia. Consequently, the combination of these factors brought about controversy and debate of the Archibald Prize. Few artists may have displayed and demonstrated their strengths in the art making process despite potential conflict. Without the controversy and views from the audience, the contest would not motivate artists from all over Australasia to compete in such a contest. Nevertheless the Archibald

More about Archibald Prize Controversy Analysis

Open Document