The spread of the share of the market is pretty much dominated by Sam’s Club and Costco; 36% and 56% respectively. The competition is there, but not between each other. While the Wholesale clubs have lower prices and larger quantities, they lack in other areas which sometimes drive consumers away from them and towards other stores such as Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and other such retailers. But some of those things that scare away the consumer from Wholesale clubs, attract other kinds of consumers, which then deter them from shopping at the non-wholesale clubs. I would personally say that, of the five forces, the substitution from other industries would be the strongest.
There was not one dominant player within the industry; they were more equally balanced thus increasing rivalry. The High fixed cost for running a discount store resulted in an economies of scale effect, this can be seen when Wal-Mart decided to gain economies of scale by building their own distribution centres to add value. Going public in order to finance the extra storage was important for Wal-Mart to utilise capacity as efficiently as possible, they did this by creating distribution hub around 15-20 stores. The increased rivalry continues, this was due to the low levels of product differentiation and little in the way of own branding, products were standard in nature through all discount stores. Also the low switching cost and consumer awareness of shopping around to find the best bargains increased competition around stores to capture customers.
The main source of profitability of Swift is the club, to open a club does not cost the entrepreneur much. Since the start-up price does not seem to be significant, there is high potential of new entrant to enter into the market. Competition from producers of substitute products Competitive pressures from substitute are strong when good substitute are readily available and attractively priced and buyers have low costs in switching to substitute. Swift has many competitor in the area of entertainment, there is a high possibility for their customer to
Yes, the company’s business model is appealing because the company’s increased inventory turnover and low operating costs allowed it to maintain a profit, despite their significantly lower gross margins compared to the industry (traditional wholesalers, mass merchandisers, supermarkets and supercenters). What are the chief elements of Costco’s strategy? How good is the strategy? The chief elements are pricing, product selection, maintaining low operating costs and expansion. Pricing/Product Selection-The company philosophy was to provide high end quality product and/or services to club members but maintain low prices.
They have a good variety of products to shop for. Wal-Mart has many competitors, but one of the strengths that the company has the ability to lower the prices for their customers need. Wal-Mart can be consider a unique store because of one special strategy that they have. The strategy consists of comparing the prices of the other stores, if the other store has an ad of a lower price than Wal-Mart, then they will give it to them to the same price. Many costumers is one of the plus that they give to Wal-Mart because this means that they don’t have to go store by store catching all the specials that they have.
Dyson invests heavily in Chinese and Asian manufacturing in order to make their products more cheap, so they can maintain profit margins. This emphasis on design in their organizational planning means not as many products go out, but what they do sell they can sell to a specialized market for higher prices. Given the innovation that is present in Dyson’s business strategy, it is quite clear that their strategic capability is high, though their risks can be high as well, due to the experimental and ‘out there’ nature of their products, which may be too daunting for normal consumers. 2 To what extent do you think any of the
As we all know Wal-Mart`s strategy to win against its competitors is its offered prices. The company is considered leader in the market because it has the capability to offer the lowest prices for this reason Wal-Mart is considered to have a large negotiating power. They can negotiate with suppliers to drop prices and consequently lower prices. In my opinion NAFTA benefits plus Wal-Mart`s purchasing power was the combination that allowed the company to be successful. Wal-Mart uses time inventory system which allows them to keep track of what they need
The primary cost advantage is Wal-Mart’s superior distribution capability (location of stores, inside-out growth patterns, cross-docking, superior information management). Wal-Mart’s prices are low by the industry standard, which, combined with its lower costs, indicates a strategy that aims at growth in volume through grabbing increased market share. Low prices, advanced data management and extremely motivated employees (“10 ft rule”, “sundown rule”) means a better customer experience than at other discount retailers, even though Wal-Mart remains a self-service retailer. In addition, the large size of the traditional Wal-Mart stores adds convenience by offering a one-stop solution by offering a wide range of products. It’s worth mentioning that Wal-Mart acquired volume through a careful consideration of locations, away from competition.
The rules of marketing may have changed but it definitely does not mean that IM is the only answer for marketers. For a company like HubSpot, whose products appeal to a certain type of customer, specifically people who are familiar with 2.0 and know what product they are looking for, IM is effective because potential customers are already familiar with the platform and are shopping around. IM is also good because it is cheaper and provides very informative details on the company’s products. However, if a business only offers products which appeal to older or specific customers who are not familiar with web 2.0, IM will not work. One example of a business where IM will not work is a business that that sells electric wheelchair.
The EVA trend seems to be almost mandatory for the larger companies, but there is no reason that it shouldn’t work just as well for their smaller firm. The implementation of this decision tool would benefit the company in three distinct ways. First of all, EVA data would provide stockholders and potential investors with comparable data to their competitors. If the investors are looking for EVA valuations to help make their assessment of companies, then it would be dutiful for OSI to provide this data. Stock prices are determined by