Industrial Foundation Owned Companies Case Study

1271 Words6 Pages
Another argument which theoretically explains the underperformance could be that Industrial foundation get the majority ownership of companies, there is a limit to diversification ownership. According to Fama and Jensen in 1985, industrial foundations bear risk which is not correlate to the market, that is to say the idiosyncratic risk. This has the consequence that foundations will make probably more risk adverse compared to investor owned companies with other type of ownership and would be less profitable. unconcentredrisk***** Moreover, a disadvantage which could be also relevant is the situation where the foundation is short of funds and reticent to give up control of the firm. In this situation foundation owned companies could be capital rationed.10 As a consequence, they could make more short term decisions than other types of companies and being less efficient and less profitable on long term. For example, Hansmann and Thomsen found that in spite of good performance of these companies, they grow little bit slower than listed companies. Capitalrationing**** In addition, I think foundation owned companies may use bad decisions when they invest. I mean that they are faced to a risk of overinvestment in the sense that when they are profitable and have positive cash flow, I think they have tendency to reinvest in the firm even when it…show more content…
Managers and employees may therefore find it easier to identify them with foundation owned firms knowing that dividends will be reinvested or be donated to charity. Holmén and Dijk (2012) find from an experiment that participants are more likely to maximize profits by hard bargaining when the proceeds go to a charity. This own identification to the firm allow to be more concerned by the purpose, the vision and the mission. The company should be thereby more efficient and

More about Industrial Foundation Owned Companies Case Study

Open Document