Lee Strirobel Analysis

854 Words4 Pages
In Lee Strobel’s article, Objection 6: A Loving God Would Never Torture People in Hell, Strobel, through a conversation with J.P. Moreland, argues that the concept of hell as described by Christian theists is not morally unjustifiable (MU) and is also morally justifiable (MJ). Strobel’s first aim is to accurately define hell—both its properties and non-properties. Hell is not a “fire and brimstone” torture chamber, which would make it MU—rather, it is simply the eternal separation from the person of God. Biblical references to flames and “gnashing of teeth” are strictly figurative, Strobel states. The clear distinction between “punishing” and “punishment,” becomes absolutely essential in this case. The essence of hell is that it is a place for those who will be forever separated from God, His characteristics and His people. It is a one-time judgment with lasting consequences. It is not an eternal punishing; rather, a punishment that lasts for all eternity. Hell, Strobel argues, was created as the place for those whose decisions in life led to inevitable separation from God. In that way, it is the choice of the individual, demonstrated in earthly decisions, that determines the eternal destination. A hell with equal punishment for…show more content…
An eternity of realized earthly wrongdoings that have caused eternal consequence is the hell of hell. A life lived viewing oneself as the center of the universe and rejecting the love of God will cause overwhelming remorse. This, Strobel argues, is the true punishment: the acknowledge of immense wrong to a loving God and eternal regret and anguish. Strobel also argues that though the concept seems MU—why such an intense consequence for something seemingly unequal?—the actuality is that rejection of God is the greatest offence. To rebel against an all-loving Creator God is the ultimate form of rebellion and the most self-centered earthly decision to

More about Lee Strirobel Analysis

Open Document