Labour lost power in 1924 because of events it could not control rather than its record in Government. Ninety years ago today, the British political landscape was shattered by the election of the first Labour government, the Annual Register called it ‘A revolution in British politics as profound as that associated with the Reform Act of 1832’. After an inconclusive election on 6 December 1923 resulting in a hung parliament resulted in Ramsay MacDonald taking office as both Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary leading a minority government on 22 January 1924. However labour’s time in the lime light was cut short; on the 8th of October that same year the Macdonald administration was voted out of parliament. The nature of the labour’s downfall is fickle as it is arguable whether or not labour’s downfall is owed to
However, was this date really one of history’s great turning points? Use the TIMELINE to make your own mind up! 1791 • ABOLITIONISTS DEFEATED - William Wilberforce introduces his first Bill to abolish the slave trade. Despite the mountain of evidence that Clarkson had collected and a brilliant speech by Wilberforce in parliament it is heavily defeated by 163 votes to 88 votes. • THOUSANDS SUPPORT SUGAR BOYCOTT - Wilberforce is now convinced that only massive public support can persuade parliament to abolish the slave trade.
Redmond had been fighting for the home rule bill to be passed. And when the third home rule bill was introduced into the house of commons Redmond saw it as barely acceptable and could only be sold to the more extreme INP members as a starting point for future progress. The speech was said in Jan 1913 that was nearly a year after the Third home rule was introducded to Parliament, however since then there had been a rise in unionist protests which would have infurated him as they was challenging his view and causing tension in Ireland between the 2 sides. Overall Source C does
They raised taxes from 10-50% and starved the populace to get the maximum profits. Nevertheless, the company continued to suffer financially, and influenced Parliament to pass the Tea Act in 1773 to lift import duties on tea shipped to the American colonies, which ultimately lead to the American War of Independence in April 1775. John Hancock was a merchant, statesman, and prominent Patriot of the Revolution. He served as president of the Second Continental Congress and was the first and third Governor of Massachusetts. Hancock began his political career in Boston as a protégé of Samuel Adams, an influential local politician, though the two men later became estranged.
Critical Analysis of the Olive Branch Petition Because of the tone in which the 2nd Continental Congress adopted in the Olive Branch Petition, I believe if King George III would have read the document he would have acted in a different manner. The 2nd Continental Congress convened in 1775 with all the colonial leaders to talk about what their next course of action would be following the recent Battle of Lexington and the Battle of Concord. Though Congress, as whole, decided that they would try one last time at a last-ditch effort to restore peaceful, yet volatile, relations with Britain. However, many of the leaders were fed up and wanted to take action because they felt that war at this point was inevitable anyway. They were truly ready to secede from Britain and become sovereign by their own right.
That wasn’t enough, so Charles asked for more against precedent. The Commons refused. They granted tonnage and poundage (traditionally given to a new monarch for life) for only a year, pending legislation to stop the introduction of any new impositions. Charles dissolved them when they began to criticise Buckingham’s handling of affairs. 1626- Charles made the leaders of the opposition (e.g.
The expense of creating a Scottish Parliament also raised some criticism, and the West Lothian Question was also a major issue. The idea for some sort of devolution for Scotland had been around since the 1880s, with several campaigns during that period. In the build up to the 1997 election, the Labour Party promised the Scottish people a referendum on the issue of devolution. The results of this referendum led to the system which we see today. The framework for devolution was developed by the Scottish Constitutional Convention.
Since 1997, the government was conservative for 18 years and wanted to reform the House of Lords. This was successfully achieved by the removal of heredity peers from their voting rights. However, Devolution for Scotland has been the most successful constitutional reform overall since 1997 because it has been able to achieve much more than expected e.g. gain more power. Scotland felt it needed more power and
The Constitution was also called the "Great Experiment” because at this time most Americans were pro-monarch and people were used to it because they were controlled by the King of Great Britain. Being controlled by the people and self governed was a radical concept and people were not use to it. The Constitution had a series of authors which took concepts from several philosophers and other societies to make the Constitution something that would satisfy everyone for a long time. Philosophers and writers like Locke and Montesquieu had ideas from governments like those of Greece and Rome. These countries and famous writers and philosophers inspired the creation of our Constitution.
Analyze the Changes in the Electoral System After the 1832 Reform Act. "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." (Paine, T. 1776 Ch.1) Throughout the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century, Britain cried out for reform. The working class people and some middle class Britain was not happy with the way things were and wanted change. Specifically change in the electoral system, where prior to the Reform Act of 1832 the vast majority of them were disenfranchised and had very little say in the way things were decided and they wanted more involvement.