Analysis Of Eudora Welty's Why I Live At P. O.

475 Words2 Pages
In Eudora Welty’s “Why I live at P.O.”, Sister, the narrator, tries to alter the viewpoints of the reader to shape their interpretations to match the bias and the animosity towards the family. People often allow their perceptions to be influenced by a self-serving bias that can jade the depth of reality. In her reality, Sister is the victim that gets ridiculed by her family especially her sister Stella-Rondo whom she harbors a jealousy. Sister claims her life was “fine” before Stella-Rondo shows up and interrupts everything. She describes Stella-Rondo be inconsistent and unstable based on her being spoiled when they were children. Sister uses this immediately to make a point of her sister’s unappreciation for everything she has ever had. But she never describes how she behaved as a child which can be suggested that she may think the reader can assumed she was the better of the two. Then, she goes to say that out of nowhere Stella-Rondo leaves her husband and returns home with a two-year-old child whom she claims is adopted. Sister sees right through her sister’s façade considering the timing of everything. Her simple comment on the matter sparks Stella-Rondo to attack by turning Papa-Daddy against her saying that she wonders why he doesn’t cut his beard (Welty). Sister makes Stella-Rondo seem powerful so she can seem like the…show more content…
At the end she says if her sister explain the whole situation truthfully, “[she would] simply put [her] fingers in both [hers] ears and refuse to listen”(Welty). Her motives involved her not showing how bad her family treated her but for her to be viewed as victim. One can agree people get treated unfairly but empathy is only appropriate when necessary. The reality of a situation can be altered by the way people view it either by being not bias or by a personal
Open Document