Although censorship is needed with issues concerning children, majority of censorship is a violation of our rights because what one person may find offensive and obscene does not necessarily represent that all citizens. The freedom to read is essential to the democratic way of life. But today, that freedom is under attack. The government is working to remove both books and periodicals from sale, to exclude certain books from public schools, to censor and silence magazines and newspapers, and to limit "controversial" books and periodicals to the general public. The overthrow of reading materials is defeat of creative thought.
Parents should definitely have a right to say what their children can and cannot read, but they do not have the freedom to say what other children can or cannot read. Once a parent complains to a school, the school can’t do anything except pull the book out of the curriculum, and that is not equitable to anyone. There are plenty of reasons that people have come up with to justify banning a book. For example: “they teach children to spy” or “it encourages children to break dishes so they
In the passage you are about to read I will tell you some reasons why books should not be banned from any libraries. First, the children reading the book have probably heard the words before. So they should learn to use the words appropriately. Also, the children should learn not to say the words as a joke because many people can be offended by the words being said to them. I understand that you might think that people should watch their language around children.
Why Children Despise Reading Prior to starting public school, the idea of reading and writing is exciting to many young children. Being able to communicate grammatically as well as verbally with others is an important milestone in a young child’s life. Because of this, educators are pressed to make sure their students are not shorted in their English education. However, according to John Holt’s How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading, the present conventional methods of teaching English are hindering children from enjoying the experience of reading and writing. Today, children view school as a “place of danger”, and their main focus is to avoid danger as much as possible (Holt 360).
They would be acting against freedom of speech because the libraries wouldn’t be able to carry the books they wanted. Also, people should be able to read what they want to. Congress shouldn’t decide what is good and what isn’t. If parents don’t want their kids to read certain books, then they should monitor the books that their children want to read. Moreover, this acts against freedom of speech because people wouldn’t be able to read what they want to.
Forcing and limiting them to wear a uniform can limit their ways to stand out from a crowd. The way you dress is a normal way for people to express themselves and limiting teenagers to that makes them try to stand out in other ways that are not always good. They could get into bad habits or it could affect their grades and school. Religious people also would have trouble accepting the uniform because of their morals and values and the way they dress. Having a mandatory uniform limits teenager’s creativity and their expressive side.
The parents of these children have read these book and most likely learn things the don't even relies came from the books they do not want the kids to read. banning books is one of the worst things that could be done; moreover, it is unlawful and takes away from learning. In this day and age if the
Many schools across the United States have banned books from their libraries and curriculum, because of content in these books that they have deemed inappropriate for students. However, I feel that books should not be banned at our school. There are many reasons why I feel that books should not be banned. A few of them follow. One, here in the United States we are provided with freedoms including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Books are constantly beint banned. Parents do not want their children to be exposed to materials the find inapropriate. Although it is easy to understand a parent wanting to protect his/her child sometimes borders are crossed. People are right when they say limits should be set, but the question comes up..."who should be held responsible for setting them.?" Who gets to choose what is right and not right.
Such as parents banning books so their children do not have to read books that they think are inappropriate. I believe books should not deserve to be banned in Liberty High School because we Junior High School students deserve to read unique kinds of books so we can experience the different qualities that books have. For instance, in my high school career, I have read books that have been banned but there are two specific books that I’ve been concerned of; which is Flowers for Algernon and Romeo and Juliet. A number of parents have banned these two specific books