Also, some adults do not end up getting married, almost 19 million Americans (Benokraitis, n.d., 3). Furthermore, children under the age of 18 living with two married parents went from 77 percent to 67 percent (Benokraitis, n.d, 3). That finding shows the increase of divorce among Americans. The article, “The Changing Landscape of Family”, states that women are spending less time with their children than before and there is a decrease in the number of children per family. This is partially because women have started to go back to work and the economy in the present day is not very stable so supporting a bigger family is not easily done.
It can be quite prevailing for individuals to have financial problems towards health coverage. Based on the Health Affairs reference, “In the last decade, health insurance premiums costs have increased by 80%... whereas 58% of Americans report they are not able to seek medical attention due to high costs” (Gary Claxton, Matthew Rae, and Nirmita Panchal, et al). Statistics also present many factors exhibiting millions of individuals facing the risk of losing their insurance. Above all, health insurance is a basic health necessity. Medical services being available to everyone will benefit the public health not only with quality, but along with quantity.
Medicare is a Federal Government program designed to cover people age 65 or older, people with certain disabilities and serious kidney failure. Within this program, there are four sub divisions also called “parts”. • Part A - cover hospital insurance such as hospital stays, nursing facilities, supplies, etc. • Part B – cover Supplementary Medical Insurance such as physician and nursing services, home – health services, outpatient visits. This part carries a deductible and a monthly premium.
empower and educate individuals to make healthy choices, and 4.) eliminate disparities in traditionally underserved populations to improve the quality of life for all Americans (CITATION). The council works closely with the Institute of Medicine to make strategies on how to use funds to improve public health. PPACA supporters feel that as America strives to increase public health thought preventative care, Americans will be healthier and need fewer costly
For example, creating numerous amount of jobs and homes which are going to be occupied just for a certain period of time because the upcoming generation is not as massive as the baby boomers. The ageing population is going to impact Canada’s economy because of the increase in taxes, the numerous amount of money invested in the retiring baby boomers, and it would break our economy due to America’s suffering economy. First off, the economy would suffer massively due to the increase in the tax rates. When the baby boomers begin to retire the taxes would rise so the government can support their needs. Since the baby boomers would retire at such a late age, majority of them would not be so healthy.
Some of these programs are SNAP(food stamps), government provided health care, utility assistance, and even checks from the government to help pay for your children. These are government expenses that could be reduced because they are often times abused in modern society. Limitation on having more children will cut government spending, reduce children born into low quality situations, and reduce teenage pregnancy chains. Government programs, such as food assistance and health care, can be very expensive, especially when more people are receiving it then paying taxes to fund them. Children of families that receive government assistance are more likely to have children as teenagers and are in turn are more likely to receive more government assistance because they are not financially stable.
Today millions of Americans cannot afford the sufficient health care they need. The price of health insurance is costing us the people thousands of dollars. Therefore, I believe the government should provide health care to all citizens regardless of their ability to pay for that care. Some rich people may prefer to pay for medical treatment, while the government must necessarily subsidize the health care for children, senior citizens, the unemployed and the homeless, as these groups cannot provide for themselves and, are extremely financially vulnerable. However, working adults can use the benefits of the medical insurance, which will give them an opportunity for a decent medical service and reduce the general taxation burden.
There should be a way to help the community on these there needs for paying their bills. Another problem for the health care bill is that the economy is keep increasing and it is a very difficult situation for low income families to deal with, they could not pace themselves because of the expenses. A reality for this problem could end up for people working extra job just to get rid of the health care, which can make people stress of whether die or keep working. A good solution for this problem is that the hospital should depend there billing payment according to the income that a family has because they also need money to support their family. There should also be more treatment to help people and make
Health Studies Social Aspects of Health HEA1181: 2009 . Mark- 65% Discuss the structural changes of the NHS April 2008 The National Health Service (NHS) has supplied free healthcare services in Britain since 1948. During this time the costs of this service have increased dramatically. This has provoked many changes in the structure and organisation of the service. The government attempts to improve the efficiency of the service which have bought about advantages and disadvantages alike.
Many seniors are able to keep themselves physically healthy until late 60’s, but for the seniors that suffer from disease or are hurt due to injuries will suffer from this once they hit that age. Doing this also sets up for the future of the incoming seniors, for us, and for our future children. Lastly, it’s also a moral and/or ethical reasoning behind it, for many people have relatives who are well over 70 and are battling disease or injured and need the Medicare to survive. Many people do not take into account of disease when looking at the life expectancy rate. Cutting the benefits for Medicare off at 70 because that is the current life expectancy rate is justifiable, but is also arguable.