Dr. Faustus a Source for the Tempest

522 Words3 Pages
After the initial reading of Dr. Faustus and The Tempest, acknowledging Dr. Faustus as a source text for The Tempest was taxing. Knowing that Shakespeare read and studied Dr. Faustus caused greater reflection and determination to find some links between the two pieces of literature. Focusing additional attention on the main characters revealed some similarities. Although the plots are very different, there are some similarities in character development. Antonio is comparable to Lucifer. Antonio seeks glory for himself by usurping his title from his brother, much like Lucifer steals Faustus' control over his own thoughts. Antonio continues his labor for power by endeavoring to induce Sebastian to kill his brother for the kingdom of Naples. Lucifer clings to his power by continuously preventing Faustus from returning to God at crucial points in the story. Although in the end of The Tempest, Antonio does not prevail, Lucifer does triumph in Dr. Faustus. Ariel is analogous to the Good Angel, while Caliban is the counterpart to the Evil Angel and then later to Mephistophilis. In Faustus, the Good Angel attempts to persuade Dr. Faustus to avoid the practice of black magic but is unsuccessful. In The Tempest, Ariel, although a spirit with some mystical abilities does not perform evil actions by his own will, but under the control of Prospero; also, Ariel prevents Sebastian from murdering Alonso, and Ariel reports Caliban's plot to murder Prospero. Caliban is like the Evil Angel. Early in the play, he incites Prospero to seek revenge on Alonso for his part in the conspiracy to usurp his title. As the play progresses, Caliban becomes more like Mephistophilis. It becomes apparent Caliban is used as a slave by Prospero, just as after Faustus makes his deal with Lucifer, Mephistophilis fulfills all of Faustus' wishes, whims, and desires. Wagner could be the foundation for

More about Dr. Faustus a Source for the Tempest

Open Document