Dtc Case Study

1538 Words7 Pages
OBJECTIVE This study will examine the Massachusetts rearrest rates of nonviolent drug offenders treated in Drug Treatment Courts (DTC) in contrast to offenders sent to incarceration. DTCs provide an effective way to break the cycle of drug use and its resulting criminal behavior. DTCs use judicial monitoring, supervision, drug testing and education to rehabilitate the offenders. These programs often defer or suspend sentences in exchange for successful completion of the treatment program. If the offender does not complete the treatment, the initial sentence of incarceration is enforced (Gottfredson, 2003). Reducing recidivism rates will also impact other problems including overcrowding and correctional expenditures. PRIOR RESEARCH Previous…show more content…
Time to failure was used as the dependent variable which would measure the date the offender was classified into the DTC group, or not, to the date of the first rearrest. For 2 years subjects would be tracked to monitor their progress. The dependent variable identified in this research was the assignment of the offender either to the DTC or not. (Banks, 2004) Limitations described in the study of the BCDTC were that the failure date was based on the rearrest within that state. Any arrests outside of the state would not be included as the date of failure. An additional limitation of the study is that it is possible that the relationship between drug treatment and reduced recidivism is due to unmeasured and unknown variables predicting both. The final limitation is that the research does not differentiate between in-program recidivism and post-program recidivism. Be able to differentiate between the two is necessary because of the probability that subjects behave differently when being directly supervised by the court. Despite the limitations found in the BCDTC, the findings of the research proved that subjects who participated in the DTC were less likely to be rearrested than the control group. The failure rate for DTC subjects was 66.2%. Failure rates for non-DTC subjects were 81.3% (Gottfredson, 2003).…show more content…
The decision to graduate an offender must be approved by the DTC judge. CONCLUSION This study will improve upon past studies including the BCDTC because this will follow the graduates longer than the 2 years. The information in the study will be continually updating as years go by. The additional years of follow up will provide a more detailed success-to-failure rate of the DTC. More detailed studies are important to help answer the effectiveness of DTC to rehabilitate better than incarceration. This research will improve upon the other studies by attempting to solve their limitations. The idea of a third unknown variable resulting in a successful rehabilitation will be answered by continually surveying the 100 participants to the reason for their success. The limitation of not being made aware of an out of state arrest could be monitored by yearly checkups of the participants. The implication of proving that DTCs can better rehabilitate offenders than correctional facilities would revolutionize the judicial response to drug related crimes. A change in focus from incarceration to rehabilitation will improve the society and improve the effectiveness and reducing the load of the judicial system.

More about Dtc Case Study

Open Document