Essay Comparing The Crucible And The Mccarthy Trials

1192 Words5 Pages
Similarities between The crucible and Arthur Miller’s notion of the McCarthy trials Arthur Miller was a prominent playwright of the late 20th century. His plays dealt mainly with the emerging American middle class after the World War 2 and “Death of a salesman” (1949) remains one of his major successes winning many awards. The Crucible in my opinion however was one of his plays which was directly related to a situation he personally went through. He wrote the Crucible in 1953 and it is clear that the book was a metaphor for the McCarthy trials going on in the country at the same time. After the end of World War 1, a new fear gripped the world-Communism. The world viewed communism as a threat to democracy and there was an unspoken agreement that the world not allow its spread. This fear only worsened after World War 2 with the signing of the Alien Registration Act of 1940. This act required everyone who was not a legal American resident to fill a form stating their political beliefs. The…show more content…
The little evidence they had was circumstantial and was hard to believe. However, authorities along with the people did not see any issues with prosecuting fellow members of the society based on this improbable evidence. Their preconceived notions as well as the mass hysteria blinded and clouded their sound judgment leading them to make bad decisions that did not only affect them, but ruined other’s lives forever. In conclusion, Miller’s personal opinions about the McCarthy trials greatly influenced his writing of the Crucible. He saw an undeniable connection between them, two instances where in his opinion pre conceived notions of higher authorities ruined the lives of many people. He saw the events as a representation of what a society with an imbalance of power was capable of achieving and how lives could be crushed under the oppressive hand of
Open Document