Koss Corporation Fraud Case

753 Words4 Pages
Koss Corporation Corporate Governance, Internal Control, and Ethics What When Wrong? 1. Review the fraudulent activities. What went wrong? Describe what internal controls were missing or circumvented. Consider the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requirements, and review the definition of internal controls. Who is responsible for internal controls? What reporting is required? The Fraud is taken by vice president of finance, secretary, and principal accounting officer, Sue According to the Fraud triangle, Sue have perceived needs to keep her wealthy life. She is the person have red flags which lifestyle beyond their current means. The weak internal control let Sue see perceived opportunity to get the extra money. Under the rationalization of compulsive shopping disorder, she start committed the fraud with her assistance Julie. According to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002), the senior management especially CEO have responsibility of design, maintenance and effective operation of internal control. Clearly, Michael, serves as vice chairman, president, CEO, COO, and CFO have responsibility on internal control. 2. What were the problems in the corporate governance and/or organization structure? What are the major requirements of SOX with respect to corporate governance and/or organization structure? How would corporate management and the accounting function be better organized? The management override of control: Based on the case, Michael himself override the control of company for several times. For example, approved invoice of $5000 or more for payment, processing wire transfers and cashier’s checks outside of accounts payable system did not require his approval. Have difficulties on IT and maintaining effective accounting system: the computerized accounting system was almost 30 years old and did not have sufficient controls. Didn’t set up good “ tone at the
Open Document