Facts In 1983, GEICO announced plans to purchase several million shares of its outstanding common stock for $60 per share. Among GEICO’s largest stockholders was Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., an investment company. Executives of the two companies decided that Berkshire would tender approximately 350,000 if its GEICO shares in the stock buyback plan, which would allow Berkshire to treat the transaction as a proportionate redemption. In a proportionate redemption, the percentage equity interest of on company in a second company is maintained at the level that existed immediately before the transaction. For federal taxation purposes, the proceeds received by the investor company in a proportionate redemption are taxed as dividends by applying the effective intercorporate dividend tax rate.
Total liabilities ÷ Total stockholders' equity 283,800÷292,200=97.1% 248,000÷268,000 = 92.5% j. (Income before taxes+ Interest) Interest (55,000 + 8,000) ÷ 8,000 = 7.9 times (54,800 + 7,200) ÷ 7,200 = 8.6 times k. Plant assets ÷ Long-term debt 270,000 ÷ 132,000 = 2.05 : 1 255,000 ÷ 127,000 = 2.01 : 1 l. Net income ÷ Net sales 32,000 ÷ 230,000 = 13.9% 32,800 ÷ 210,000 = 15.6% m. Net sales ÷ Avg. total assets 230,000 ÷ 546,000=0.42 210,000 ÷ 516,000=0.41* n. Net income ÷ Avg. total assets OR (l.) x (m.) 32,000 ÷ 546,000 = 5.9% 32,800 ÷ 516,000 = 6.4%* o. Net income ÷ Avg.
Dividends and dividend equivalent rights declared | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | (10,676 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (10,676 | ) | Repurchase of common stock | | | (46,976 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (22,950 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (22,950 | ) | Share-based compensation | | | 0 | | | | 2,253 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,253 | | Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | | 6,981 | | | | (143 | ) | | | (444 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (587 | ) | Tax benefit from equity awards, including transfer pricing adjustments | | | 0 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,232 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balances as of September 28, 2013 | | | 899,213 | | | $ | 19,764 | | | $ | 104,256 | | | $ | (471 | ) | | $ | 123,549 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other things equal they prefer to pay more for stocks that are more risky and have uncertain cash flows. • Investors are risk averse. Other things equal they prefer to pay more for stocks that are less risky and that have relatively certain cash flows than other stocks. When determining the value of a firm, which of the following statements is ture? • A financial asset is considered to have value if it has the ability to generate positive cash flows.
August 14, 2011 Week 6 Project 2 International Reporting Case A.) 1.) Return on Assets $58,333 (net income) / $1,404,726 (total assets) = 4.15% 2.) Return on stockholder’s equity $58,333 (net income) / $176,413 (stockholder’s equity) = 33.07% 3.) Debt to assets ratio $1,202,134 (total debt) / $1,404,726 (total assets) = 87.4% B.)
Return on common stockholders’ equity $29,946,992 - (2430872-15801332) / 200,000 = 82.9% * Solvency ratios 9. Debt to total assets $7,628,563 / 34,825,498 = 22% 10. Times interest earned 3,272,314 / 121,533 = 26.9 Riordan Manufacturing, Inc. Horizontal Analysis for the Balance Sheet Increase or (Decrease) 2010($) 2009($) Amount % Assets Cash $2,807,029 $1,511,253 $1,295,776* 46.1%* Account Receivables $2,695,342 $2,644,307 $51,035 1.9% Current Portion of Note Receivable $102,976 $117,475 ($14,499) (14.1%) Inventory $8,517,203 $7,123,790 $1,393,413 16.4% Deferred Income Taxes – net $0 $0 $0 0% Pre-Paid Expenses and other Items $402,240 $458,875 ($56,635) (14.1%) Total Current Assets $14,524,790 $11,855,700 $2,669,090 18.4% Liabilities Current Liabilities Current Portion of Long-Term Debt $474,032 $484,894 ($10,862) (2.3%) Accounts Payable $1,391,385 $1,636,923 ($245,538) (17.6%) Accrued
Therefore, the cost of fixed rate debt equals 8.95% plus 1.1% risk premium, which totaled to 10.5% Cost of Debt = (0.5 x 0.08) + (0.5 x 0.105) = 0.095 = 9.25% [since floating rate and fixed rate debt both weigh 50%, we use the weighted average approach to calculate the total cost of debt rate] Based on historical data analysis below, we get an average income tax rate of 42%. | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | Income before income taxes | 83.5 | 105.6 | 103.5 | 121.3 | 133.7 | 185.1 | 236.1 | 295.7 | 360.2 | 398.9 | Income tax | 35.4 | 43.8 | 40.6 | 45.2 | 50.2 | 76.7 | 100.8 | 128.3 | 168.5 | 175.9 | Tax rate | 42% | 41% | 39% | 37% | 38% | 41% | 43% | 43% | 47% | 44% | | | | | | | | | | | | Average tax rate | 42% | | | | | | | | | | After-tax cost of debt = (1 - 0.42) x 0.0925 = 0.05365 = 5.365% Cost of Equity From Table B and Exhibit 5, * Risk free rate (1-year)= 6.9% Premium = 8.47% * Risk free rate (10-year)= 8.95% Premium = 7.43% ** ** Since A rated bond is considered upper medium grade and the company is A rated, we assume long-term
Drew’s basis in the residence is: Question 2. (TCOs 3, 4, 5, & 7) In the current year, Galaxy Corporation, a closely held C corporation that is not a personal service corporation, has $80,000 of passive losses, $60,000 of active business income, and $10,000 of portfolio income. How much of the passive loss may Galaxy deduct
Liquidity Ratio Calculations: Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities $147,800 / $90,283 = $1.637:1 Acid-Test Ratio = (Cash + Short-Term Investments + Net Receivables) / Current Liabilities $89,664 + $0 + $51,869 / $90,283 = $1.567:1 Receivables Turnover = Net Credit Sales / Average Receivables ($1,109,295 - $89,664) / [($51,869 + $81,557) / 2] = 15.283 *Average Collection Period = 365 / 15.283 = 23.883 Days When evaluating Huffman Trucking’s ability to pay off short-term debt and maturing obligations, it’s imperative to analyze the company’s liquidity. Utilizing the current ratio to analyze liquidity, which compares all current assets to current liabilities,
Figure 1 shows the profits from the exercise of a warrant when n = 1 and K = $5 for different values of St . As shown in the figure, if St is lower than K, it is not advantageous for the holder to exercise the warrant and the payoff is zero. However, if St is greater than K, the payoff is the difference St − K, and it is greater the greater St is. Because a warrant’s payoff is greater the larger the value of the underlying stock, a warrant holder can choose not to exercise the warrant even if the payoff is positive because he may expect that St will rise even further in the future. Because most warrants can be exercised any time before their expiration date, the profit the holder would receive if he were to exercise a warrant immediately is called the warrant’s intrinsic value.