Science Fiction Analysis Of 2001: A Space Odyssey

1259 Words6 Pages
2001 A Space Odyssey and Planet of the Apes are catagorised as science fiction, a genre which is defined as “Fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances and major social or environmental changes, frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.” | Science fiction is a genre heavily shaped by the issues, knowledge and ethos of the time in which it was created. Since the two films were released exactly a month apart and embody the majority of the same themes and concerns, the connection to the 60’s is shown clearly by the emphasis of both these films on similar themes such as a concept of the “race of the future”, creation, evolution, religion and space travel. | The space race was taking place in the years of production, and one year after their release man walked on another world for the first time in recorded history. This was a time when man was moving further into the age of nuclear power, standing on the threshold of space travel and concerns were rising about the impact of these “advancements” on their future. | French author of “monkey planet” (the basis of Planet of the Apes) used man’s discovery of the ability to leave the planet as a springboard for his novel and predicts a dystopic future for mankind. Similarly, Stanley Kubric and Arthur C. Clarke who collaborated on the creation of 2001: A Space Odyssey also used the “space travel” hype of the 60’s to create a popular and appropriate film exploring topical concepts. | As the genre was regarded as unscientific and anti-literary prior to the 20th century, the writers and directors had to convince the viewer that what occurs is scientifically accurate and plausible. In Apes, the protagonist George Taylor justifies to the audience their ability to travel for thousands of years without significant aging by stating that it is due to “time dilation”. | Kubric and
Open Document