This is where the arguments may kick in but in the end you will be more appreciated for being you and you in turn will be better understood. Finally the most important reason why occasional arguments are good or healthy is that it doesn’t allow old or past problems to become future problems. They allow you to discuss them. If a problem goes unnoticed or not talked about it just
This statement is not paradoxical because we do not have to sacrifice ourselves to help others. Helping others gives people a sense of humanity and a feeling of hope. 2. According to Russell, what would the traditional moralist say about the belief that” love should be unselfish.” According to Russell, a traditional moralist would agree with this statement. A traditional moralist supports this statement and says that if you love someone what you do should be for their benefit.
Psychological Egoism as a moral theory describes self-centeredness. Psychological Egoism is a belief that human behavior or conduct comes under the influence of self-interest and not community. Psychological Egoism holds a strong ground that all humans get motivated to act or perform certain duties only in pursuit of their own advantage and not for others. Where Ethical Egoism is that we ought to be happy for others when at the same time making our self's or own being happy. For me I think it starts with morality in a person.
Intrinsic motivation exists inside people, in an alternate sense natural inspiration exists in connection in middle of people and exercises. Individuals are characteristically persuaded for a few exercises and not others, and not everybody is inherently inspired for any specific errand. Because intrinsic motivation exists in the nexus between a person and a task, some authors have define intrinsic motivation in terms of task being interesting while others have defined it in terms of satisfactions a person gains from intrinsically motivated task engagement ( Ryan and Deci, 2000, pg.
The listener should say what they are feeling only if it is beneficial to the relationship or to the person seeking help. When a listener displays this quality of being genuine it is most likely the seeker will become congruent as they have probably spent along time denying their feelings or not been allowed to say what they are feeling, to be congruent is to take responsibility acknowledge your feelings beware of them, then start to deal with stuff. Unconditional positive regard is respecting the help seeker as a unique being or anyone for that matter, to my believe, accepting them for who they are, this does not mean we have to agree with peoples behaviour or agree to their believes, just to accept the person; is being non-judgemental. Along with the show of genuineness and unconditional positive regard from the listener the seeker will feel comfortable within themselves, develop trust in the relationship and begin to open up, explore and start to move forward. The third quality required within this relationship is to be able to Empathise this is not to be confused with sympathy or pity, which would be to show sorrow or sadness, this would not help the seeker to progress and move on.
It is viewed more as an attitudinal or philosophical approach to counseling rather than a theory of therapy because it is loosely based on existential philosophy and it is not tied to any particular therapeutic technique (Sharf, 2004). Broadly defined, existential therapy encourages clients to develop a full comprehension of their personal meaning of life and purpose of existence in the universe (Frankl, 1997; Yalom, 1980). It is suggested that a counselor develop his or her own
Venesha Meza SP3445 11/21/2012 Week 9 HW “Altruism and Pro-social behavior” Altruism is the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others. Pro-social behavior refers to any action that benefits other people, no matter what the motive or how the giver benefits from the action. Altruism involves true selflessness. While all altruisms acts are pro-social, not all pro-social behaviors are altruistic. For example, we might help others for a variety of reasons such as guilt, obligation, and duty or even for rewards.
Everyone has the desire to seek approval and acceptance, Positive reinforcement is the process whereby desirable behaviour is encouraged by presenting a reward at the time of occurrence of such behaviour. Through reinforcing positive behaviour you are encouraging that individual to seek attention through positive methods rather than unacceptable methods (such as challenging behaviour). Also by focusing on prompting positive behaviour can also have the effect on yourself rather than feeling angry and frustrated due to behaviours you promote that calm, relaxed positive behaviour. 2.6 Evaluate the impact on an individual’s wellbeing of using reactive rather than proactive strategies. Using reactive rather than proactive concentrates on the negatives of a behaviour rather than positivity, this would more than likely cause animosity towards staff, emotions would be high for a majority of the time and the individual could become distressed for large periods of time, the support from staff would not be positive making the individual feel isolated and alone, causing more anger and more than likely more behaviours.
This theory is the opposite of the goal setting theory. According to Robbins and Judge (2011) “Reinforcement theory ignores the inner state of the individual and concentrates solely on what happens when he or she takes some action”. This tool can be good if the employee is willing to do the required work to be successful. The goal is mostly motivational in the since of rewarding one’s effort to complete work. You have to be careful though when trying to motivate people.
Prosocial behaviour comprises all kinds of human acts, which are deemed positive by society, are carried out voluntarily and intend to benefit someone else (Hogg & Vaughan, 2008). In real life it is often based on both egoistic and altruistic motives (Jonas, Stroebe & Hewstone, 2007). Altruism on the other hand is regarded as a subcategory of prosocial behaviour, which premises that benefiting someone else is the ultimate goal of the helper, whereby a reward is neither desired, nor needed on behalf of the helper himself (Batson, 1991). The display of altruism would therefore indeed be a human selfless act per definition. However, whether true altruism really exists is a highly controversial issue among social psychologists.