Wikipedia Is Not A Credible Source

1056 Words5 Pages
Writing an Argument Writing an argument is essential to any business situation. In order to write a fairly decent argument, a person has to first find a credible source in which to base their argument off of. There are many different ways a person can communicate their argument and if they do not present their argument formally, they will cause miscommunication. Knowing which form of communication will help to present an argument effectively. By assessing information properly it can help to effectively present your argument. When presenting an argument it is important to check the sources by which the information is coming from. Without credible sources, the information that comes through could be biased or one sided so that the article…show more content…
This is because the information that is prepared for the website is by many different sources. The sources that provide the information are not very credible because at the bottom of each article that you search there are many different links that can bring you more information on the subject. To an academic person, this would not be credible because they would continuously keep searching through all the links to find a credible source. This is why most academic facilities forbid the use of Wikipedia in their schools because the information that is provide is not reliable. Many intuitions use peer-reviewed articles as credible sources. Another reason that Wikipedia is not a credible source is because most of the articles are one sided. Without presenting both sides of the arguments, a person cannot understand both sides of the story and that will bring confusing when you are dealing with situations. Also, Wikipedia do not provide crucial parts of the sources reasoning. With this they cannot complete a reasonable account of the argument a person is trying to work out. Also with Wikipedia they can twist the source’s ideas to fit their needs and that does not provide a fair…show more content…
One of the reasons is because they authors that write the papers are not interested in the subject that they are writing about. Another reason that Wikipedia should not be used for academic research papers is because many of the articles are one sided and biased so there is only one side to the article, this leads to miscommunicated information. The reason that information is so misjudged today is because there are many articles that are on sources such as Wikipedia. Knowing which sources are credible helps to understand the research that the people do. By looking through the periodicals and situations, they are able to understand the information that is being presented to the argument. When a person understands a credible source, they are making sure that both of the sides of the argument are shown and they can use the information. This is why most of the people use peer-reviewed documents in order to write academic papers because the information is more credible and both sides of the arguments are pointed

More about Wikipedia Is Not A Credible Source

Open Document