Enlightened Despotism Essay

3221 Words13 Pages
Enlightened Despotism, a movement of top-down reform that took place in some 18th-century European states—among them Prussia, Austria, Tuscany, Russia, and Portugal. Historically, the model for most enlightened despots was the powerfully centralizing, absolute monarchy of France’s Louis XIV (reigned 1643-1715). Philosophically, these rulers drew from strands of progressive political thought associated with the Enlightenment. Enlightened despotism was posed as a solution to varieties of social and political backwardness characteristic of early modern societies. Before the nation state became the dominant political form in the 19th century, monarchs often inherited a feudal patchwork of divided and overlapping sovereign entities, for example, provinces, duchies, and free cities, that claimed independent privileges against the power of the monarch. These sovereign entities were naturally the basis of the social and political power of pre-existing elites through which monarchs traditionally ruled. These elites posed resistance to enlightened despots as they sought to consolidate, and thereby amplify, powers of the state, including taxation, justice, and war-making. Beyond political arrangements, enlightened despots also sought to improve national economies that were often splintered into different customs and taxation zones, and weighed down by monopoly privileges of one sort or another. Once again, the contrast lay between backward, “feudal” division and modern rationalization and unification. Finally, in post-Reformation Europe, societies were often torn by religious schism; where these conflicts still raged, enlightened despots sought to put them down, either through religious toleration or imposed confessional unity. Indeed, it was the atmosphere of confessional conflict and civil war in 16th-century France and in 17th-century England that inspired the theories of
Open Document