| | |To show or demonstrate something|Order of importance is used with illustration|-Use evidence that is | |Illustration |clearly. It plainly demonstrates|essays. You can start supporting your main |appropriate to your topic as | | |and supports a point through the|point with your strongest evidence first, or |well as appropriate for your | | |use of evidence. |you can start
Analyze the Rhetoric Parts of an Argument to Consider * Identify the situation. * Identify the writer’s purpose. * Identify the major claim and supporting claims. * Identify the audience. Appeals to Logos = Appeal to reason * Consistency of argument * Clarity in asserting a thesis or point * Quality of reasons/evidence used in support of the point Appeals to Ethos = Appeal to Ethos by presenting writer as credible, knowledgeable, and trustworthy * Do your homework: know your subject.
Outline of the Toulmin Model I. Claim—assertion, thesis, conclusion to be established A. Contains topic plus controlling idea B. Signaled by words like ought to, must, it is essential II. Grounds—evidence, reasons, support A. Deductive--premises from which a claim is derived B. Inductive—sample, experiment, observation III. Warrants—why the reasons support the claim; principles or assumptions A. Deductive—meanings of terms, parallel argument B. Inductive—representative sample C. A generalization of why the evidence supports the claim. IV.
* Assess how disagreements about performance apprasials outcomes are managed, investigating whether BHP has a clear and consistent policy and procedure for the dispute settlement process. Also, whether the issue can be resolved quickly and appropriately, offering advice and support in cases of dissention about performance appraisal outcomes. Question 2: Introducing a Performance management system requires communication and training. What methods would you use to promote the performance management system and gather feedback from stakeholders? In promoting a
* A summary of your viewpoint and your understanding of the issue. * A point-by-point discussion of both strengths and limitations of your position, arguing overall that yours is superior. * A conclusion that drives home your thesis and looks to the future. 2. To identify points of contention first identify major
Discuss specific strategies that the U.S. project manager could use to be successful in a situation such as this. Be specific and support your response with evidence from the readings or other materials. Please be sure to use APA format for citing your
The first step s to be attentive, this means that I need to pinpoint the issue, and gather specific data. I begin by reviewing the facts of the situation and determine what facts are trustworthy. The second step is to be intelligent, this means that I need to determine what matters most by framing the issue and being aware of false issues. Being intelligent also means that I need to determine who the primary stakeholders are. Before I can make a decision I must remember that there will people stakeholders directly affected by it.
Grant proposals are specific with logical thinking and are objective driven. We are going to address the grant writing process briefly, then create an abstract and needs and problem statement, and finally finish with a full outline of the grant writing process. We are going to start with the
o This essay is a chance to demonstrate your ability to develop a “researched idea” using not only your personal viewpoint, but also the viewpoints of others. o Don’t be alarmed by the length or complexity of the sources. You will choose your position, and you will choose which texts to incorporate. As long as you address the prompt and cite the required number of sources, you will be fine. o You must be able to analyze the argument each source is making.
If the author has done their job correctly they will have supplied enough supporting evidence to either strengthen the audiences original beliefs (in the author’s favor) or to dissuade them to reconsider what they once held as true. This act of passing judgment, “the act of appraising, discriminating, sorting, adapting, transforming, and applying ideas”(Gage 76) can only be accomplished by a reader who has kept an open mind. An objective reader may find that some of his or her previously held beliefs conflict with those of the author. Such diversity in belief is a prelude to new thought processes, a catalyst to inspire alternative points of view, without them the types of respectful argument that inspire new ideas would wilt and the world would be left with the blandness of a singular idea. Such singular ideas are what intolerant readers hold near and dear to their hearts, they are the easy convictions that do not change because the reader does not allow them to do so.