Finally, prioritizing the risks; using both qualified and quantifiable measurements to prioritize the risks collected. In the second phase, Conducting Decision Support, the action items are identifying and evaluating the organization’s available controls. Microsoft highlights the use of the cost-benefit analysis as a good quantitative method (Whitman & Mattord, 2010). The second phase has several steps to it: 1. Defining the functional requirements – what is necessary to mitigate the risks?
A troubleshooting model are the steps that you would take to resolve one or more issues. Some of the different ways you could use to troubleshoot an issue could include: -Identify the problem that is happening -Try to create a theory to help determine a cause -Test the theories that were developed -Establish an action plan to quickly resolve the issue -Implement the action plan -Verify and test the system to make sure it is
Work products copies of work produced by the candidates Questioning – (oral and/or written); Professional discussion.- This can be used to support observation reports, examination of work products and knowledge questionnaires. Witness testimonies can be used as supporting evidence of a candidate’s performance. 2. How would you identify and compare different types of evidence when making your assessment decisions. All evidence from the candidates would be assessed against agreed standards of competence.
Abstract In this article, Role Theory is revisited from a structural perspective. Based on a set of intuitive hypotheses, a theory of warm-up flow is derived and the consequences presented. Experimental options are listed to test the hypotheses. Elementary concepts, such as the role map and drama interactions are introduced to capture higher level phenomena. The model unfolded is supported with a strict mathematical model describing warm-up flow in role systems.
The process of taking something apart and revealing the way in which it works is often an effective way to learn how to build a technology or make improvements to it. When reverse engineering software, researchers are able to examine the strength of systems and identify their weaknesses in terms of performance, security, and interoperability. The reverse engineering process allows researchers to understand both how a program works and also what aspects of the program contribute to its not working. • What are the advantages and disadvantages of using reverse engineering to discover the logics of a software program? Reverse engineering in software is reversing a program's machine code back into it's original source code.
OHS Hazard Identification Activity 1 * 1 How can the responsible person make an assessment as to which hazard identification tool to use? By first considering what the required outcome needs to be the responsible person can look over policies and procedures to work out not only what hazard identification tool would be the best to use but also the correct way to put the tool into use and to make sure the outcome will result in correctly identifying the hazards. By looking at previous outcomes the responsible person can also see if the tool has worked previously and how well it may work in the future What are some examples of hazard identification tools? Some of the tools used to identify what may become a hazard in the workplace are safety audits, MSDS sheets, body mapping, interviews with employee, having workplace walkthroughs or inspections, reviewing all previous incident or hazard reports and also reviewing things such as the plant or machinery diaries and the registers for the dangerous or hazardous goods that may be at work, ctivity 2 * What are some underlying reasons for utilising hazard identification tools? So that information can be collected on various specifics that relate to that hazard by using the tools and if the correct tools are used there should be a reduction in the injuries surrounding the hazard.
Discuss how reflection can develop professional practice through critically analysing two different models/theories of reflection in this module. The definition of reflection has been defined differently by various authors. Cottrell (2010) suggests that reflection is a type of thinking that is linked to gaining a better understanding of something and that it is also an important part of the learning experience and where we can make sense of the experience. This can be related to Boyd and Fales (1983) who suggest that reflection is a process which can be used to examine and explore an area of concern and which could potentially end in a changed perspective. These views can be compared to Boud et al.
2. Analyze changes in non-financial operating measures and deduce likely causes. 3. Understand the importance of aligning performance measurement with organizational vision and strategy. 4.
DHS Administrative staff use a decision-making process called Analytic Hierarch process which is a system that combines two approaches, the “black and white” of the problem and the subjectivity and intuitiveness of the problem. These two approaches are used to evaluate the psychology of the information so that decisions made on the problem would be easier to defend. In essence the Analytic Hierarchy process is a melding of qualitative and quantitative critical thinking skills to achieve productive decision-making results. Another decision-making approach that DHS uses is that of the Pareto Analysis. The Pareto Analysis is a simple technique for prioritizing possible changes by identifying the problems that will be resolved by making these changes.
The test proposes that knowing more about your own reactions gives you a better sense of self regulation and more alternatives when dealing with different kinds of people. Now that we know what this assessment measures we can look at the appropriate use of the SCARF Self-Assessment, including the reliability and validity of the test, and if the test has potential benefits or harm toward the participant. The appropriate use of the assessment falls mainly into the test publisher’s responsibilities for this particular test. The test publisher’s responsibilities are to define what